Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats.
- Howard Aiken * * * * * * *
This little gem, from "Quote of the Day", has more than just a kernel of truth. Original ideas repulse most people when first they hear of them; when an idea is trendy and getting press, you can be sure it's an older idea dressed in new togs. A brief look at the topics of the current political candidates is proof enough of this concept.
Politics continually offers examples of recycled ideas (though I'm not convinced that ideas have ever been so in danger of overuse in this arena that recycling them should be necessary); however, presidential campaign promises and the candidates who ignore them are not the topic of this post.
The realm of science, with its standards of duplicatable experiments, peer-reviewed journal articles, and scientific method, with researchers and specialists of every ilk, should be the last place one finds a blatant example of the quote above. What's even worse is that the reticence to which the quote refers to consider new ideas characterizes the academic research arm of the sciences.
For example, for decades doctors agreed that stomach and duodenal ulcers were caused by cigarettes, alcohol, stress, an "ulcer personality", fried or spicy foods, excess stomach acid, and/or coffee.
In 1982, Australian researchers Drs. Barry Marshall and Robin Warren were able to show that many stomach and duodenal ulcers were caused by the bacterium Helicobacter pylori. The accepted "causes" could be shown in some cases to increase patients' vulnerability and susceptibility to the bacterium and its effects, but they could in no way be shown to cause the ulcers.
Despite duplicatable (and duplicated) experiments, Marshall and Warren's work was soundly rejected by the scientific community, one journal editor commenting that "we have already reached a consensus about the cause of ulcers".
Now, there are two problems with the scientific foundation for the editor's statement: science should neither be democratic (one man, one vote) nor seeking a consensus rather than empirical data, and science should not reject new research simply because the new data differ from the accepted theory.
This behavior is not new in the sciences--down through the centuries, new discoveries, rather than being heralded for their new perspectives, have been rejected by most of the leaders in the field because they challenge the existing paradigm.
David Raup, paleontologist and author of the excellent bookThe Nemesis Affair (W.W.Norton & Company, 1987, 1999), addresses this topic throughout his book, and makes a particularly insightful comment on page 196: "The practical effect is that a new idea requires a truly compelling case--intellectual overkill--in order to displace the incumbent [idea]."
Dr. Marshall faced this kind of negative reception by other scientists of his evidence that H. pylori caused stomach ulcers, so . . . he drank a tablespoon of H. pylori culture and gave himself an ulcer with it. Desperate measures, to be sure, and not to be recommended, but he ultimately succeeded in proving the connection to a skeptical scientific community.
Marshall's situation demonstrates that even members of the (self-proclaimed) forward-thinking, ever-questioning, open-minded scientific community were not actually open to new ideas, despite their claims to be so. Like all humans, they needed to have a new idea rammed down their collective throats.
Chatboard (0)